Religion as a source of legitimacy of power and its influence on the distribution of welfare
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/socio-politica.v15i2.44876Keywords:
governance, legitimacy, politics, religion, welfare distributionAbstract
This study aims to analyze how religion is utilized as a source of legitimacy for power and its impact on the distribution of welfare. Religion serves as both a moral and political instrument that can either enhance or hinder social justice. This research employs a qualitative approach with a descriptive-analytical method and a literature review to examine relevant theories and empirical cases. The findings reveal that religion plays a dual role in governance and welfare policies. On one hand, it is employed by political authorities to legitimize power, shaping policies that reinforce social structures. On the other hand, religious organizations actively contribute to welfare distribution through philanthropy and social services. However, the allocation of welfare resources based on religious identity often leads to exclusivity, deepening socio-economic disparities. The study concludes that while religion holds transformative potential in promoting social justice, its role in governance must be managed inclusively to prevent reinforcing inequalities. Therefore, a collaborative approach between the state, religious institutions, and civil society is necessary to ensure that religion’s role in legitimizing power contributes positively to equitable welfare distribution.
Contribution: By advocating for collaborative efforts among the state, religious institutions, and civil society, this research provides a valuable framework for promoting equitable welfare distribution and mitigating socio-economic disparities linked to religious identity.
References
Abdullah, A. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Agama (P. Multidisipliner (ed.); 1st ed.). Lembaga Penelitian UIN Sunan Kalijaga Jogja.
Ali, Z., Ismail, N., & Ahmad, K. (2023). A Study of Imam Al-Ghazali’s Approach in Strengthening Spirituality, Psychology and Mental Health of Muslims. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 6(10s (2)), 409–421.
Althusser, L. (1971). A letter on art in reply to André Daspre. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, 201–208.
Amin, H. (2024). Value-based frameworks and peace education in faith-neutral, faith-based and faith-inspired schools in Islamabad: a comparative analysis. Journal of Peace Education, 21(1), 54–81.
An-Na’im, A. (2017). Islam and human rights: selected essays of Abdullahi An-Na’im. Routledge.
Aniqoh, U. (2022). Konsep ajaran etika pergaulan dalam pergaulan dalam Gereja Kristen Protestan Pantekosta. UIN Wali Songo.
Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2021). Co-creation: The new kid on the block in public governance. Policy & Politics, 49(2), 211–230.
Asutay, M., & Yilmaz, I. (2021). Constituting an Islamic social welfare function: an exploration through Islamic moral economy. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 14(3), 524–540.
Baba, M. A. (2017). Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. In E. Ardianto (Ed.), Aksara Timur.
Boty, M. (2015). Agama dan perubahan sosial (Tinjauan perspektif sosiologi agama. Jurnal Istinbath, 14, 41.
Casram, C. (2016). Membangun sikap toleransi beragama dalam masyarakat plural. Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama Dan Sosial Budaya, 1(2), 187–198.
Chapra, M. U. (2016). The future of economics: An Islamic perspective (Vol. 21). Kube Publishing Ltd.
Durkheim, E. (2018). The division of labor in society. In Social stratification (pp. 217–222). Routledge.
Efendy, R., Rahman, A., & Karim, A. R. (2023). Scientific Transformation of Islamic Boarding Schools through Role of Alums the Islamic Education Study Program. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 7(2), 355–369.
Ernawati, B., S., & Kurniati. (2024). Penerapan etika politik Rasulullah dalam tinjauan etika politik Islam masa kini. Jurnal Budi Pekerti Agama Islam, 2(5), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.61132/jbpai.v2i5.559
Esposito, J. L., & Voll, J. O. (2001). Makers of contemporary Islam. Oxford University Press.
Farida, U. (2014). Peran Ikhwanul Muslimin dalam perubahan sosial politik di Mesir. Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 8(1), 45–70.
Firdawaty, L. (2017). Analisis Terhadap UU No 3 Tahun 2006 dan UU No. 50 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Peradilan Agama. Al-’Adalah, 8(2), 213–220.
Galtung, J. (2009). Theories of conflict: Definitions, dimensions, negations, formations. Hawai: University of Hawai.
Gerring, J., & Cojocaru, L. (2016). Selecting cases for intensive analysis: A diversity of goals and methods. Sociological Methods & Research, 45(3), 392–423.
Gunawan, E. (2017). Relasi agama dan negara. KURIOSITAS: Media Komunikasi Sosial Dan Keagamaan, 10(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.35905/kur.v10i2.589
Habermas, J. (2014). Religion and rationality: Essays on reason, god and modernity. John Wiley & Sons.
Habermas, J. (2023). How is legitimacy made possible via legality? Revus. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law/Revija Za.
Haryanto. (2017). Elit, massa, dan kekuasaan: Suatu bahasan pengantar.
Hasan, M. M., Al Amin, M., Arefin, M. S., & Mostafa, T. (2024). Green consumers’ behavioral intention and loyalty to use mobile organic food delivery applications: The role of social supports, sustainability perceptions, and religious consciousness. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(6), 15953–16003.
Hassan, H. A. (2022). Religion as a security threat: Case studies of extremist Christian movements in Africa. Journal of Religion in Africa, 51(3–4), 426–451.
Hassan, H. M. F. U., & Jamal, M. D. (2024). Harmonizing Global Peace: The Noble Influence of Islamic Human Rights. Journal of World Religions and Interfaith Harmony, 3(1), 281–296.
Hassan, N. M., Attia, M. F., & Farag, S. (2024). Synergy of Modes for Enhancing Persuasion in Arab Socio-Religious TV Shows: A Multimodal Argumentation Analysis of Wa Mahyay. British Journal of Translation, Linguistics and Literature, 4(3), 2–42.
Irfani, K. (2022). Politik hukum: Relasi antara politik, hukum, dan agama di Indonesia. JPW (Jurnal Politik Walisongo, 4(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.21580/jpw.v4i1.5468
Ismulyadi. (2019). Agama sebagai basis terciptanya etika global. Jurnal Studi Agama, 11(1), 10.
Khudzaifah Dimyati, S. H., Setiaji, B., & Kelik Wardiono, S. H. (2023). Hukum dan lembaga Filantropi: Tawaran Konsep Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Masyarakat Berbasis Profetik. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Kurniawan, N. I. (2009). Globalisasi & Negara Kesejahteraan: Perspektif Institusionalisme. Laboratorium Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Latifah, N. (2018). Agama, konflik sosial, dan kekerasan politik. Fondatia, 2(2), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v2i2.131
Marilang, M. (2016). Ideologi welfare state konstitusi: Hak menguasai negara atas barang tambang. Jurnal Konstitusi, 9(2), 259. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk922
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi Revi. Morissan.
Muliyah, P., Aminatun, D., Nasution, S. S., Hastomo, T., Sitepu, S. S. W., & Tryana. (2020). Dasar sosial transformatif: Rekonstruksi makna dan strategi kesejahteraan sosial. Journal GEEJ, 7(2).
Netanyahu, K., & Sepniwati, L. (2024). Identity Politics and Religions: The Detrimental Effects on The ASEAN Regional Stability. International Proceeding On Religion, Culture, Law, Education, And Hindu Studies, 1, 207–237.
Nurdin, J. F. (2022). Islam dan Konsep Keseimbangan dalam lini kehidupan. UIN Ar-Raniry, 1(1), 511–513.
Petrov, A., & Rahman, F. (2023). Religion and Environmental Ethics: Towards Sustainable Development and Ecological Responsibility. International Journal of Religion and Humanities, 1(02), 67–87.
Purwowibowo, & Hendijanto, K. (2019). Perkembangan konsep kesejahteraan sosial dan pekerja sosial profesional di era global. Jurnal Kesejahteraan Sosial, 11(1), 3.
Putnam, R. D. (2000a). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. In Culture and politics: A reader (pp. 223–234). Springer.
Putnam, R. D. (2000b). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon Schuster.
Rahman, M. T. (2025). Metodologi Penelitian Agama. Prodi S2 Studi Agama-Agama UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.
Rahman, M. T., Solihin, S., Bustomi, J., & Waehama, M. R. (2024). Multikulturalisme, moderasi beragama, dan tantangan identitas di Thailand Selatan [Multiculturalism, religious moderation and identity challenges in Southern Thailand]. Gunung Djati Publishing [In Indonesian].
Ridho, A., & Thibburruhany, T. (2019). Prinsip Toleransi Beragama sebagai Pondasi Membangun Peradaban Islam di Era Modern. El-Afkar: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Dan Tafsir Hadis, 8(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/jpkth.v8i1.2048
Saripudin, Ernawati, D., & Sovania, E. (2023). Multikultural di Era Modern: Wujud Komunikasi Lintas Budaya. Budimas, 6(1).
Setyawan, M. A., Sulkifli, M. S. A. A., Rain, T. J. F., & Kurniati, K. (2024). Urgensi etika Islam dalam politik kontemporer. Aksioreligia, 2(2), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.59996/aksioreligia.v2i2.554
Soegiharto, G. T. H. (2022). Peran agama dalam mewujudkan kesejahteraan sosial. Jurnal Teruna Bhakti, 4, 270.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Sukenti, D., & Hermawan, U. (2024). Pendidikan Moderasi Beragama: Memahami Dialog Agama Perspektif Teori Otto Scharmer dalam Program Kelas Penggerak Gusdurian. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah, 9(2), 225–254.
Syahrin, M. A., Arifin, M., & Luayyin, R. H. (2022). Kesejahteraan masyarakat perspektif ekonomi syariah. JSE: Jurnal Sharia Economica, 1(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.46773/.v1i2.395
Taufani, M. R. I. (2024). Daftar lengkap aset & tanah milik Muhammadiyah.
Wayeekao, M. N. (2016). Berislam dan Bernegara bagi Muslim Patani: Perspektif Politik Profetik. IN RIGHT Jurnal Agama Dan Hak Azazi Manusia, 5(2).
Weber, M. (1992). The Protestant ethic and the" spirit" of capitalism and other writings. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gerry Ismail Anrivika, Muhammad Roflee Waehama
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
